Balancing Intensity for Optimal Results
Navigating the world of fitness in our fast-paced society is undoubtedly challenging. However, by adopting an optimal training approach, substantial results can be achieved within a constrained timeframe.
The FITT Principle: A Comprehensive Training Program
The FITT principle is grounded in four pivotal variables: Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type, guiding individuals in their fitness journey. Amongst these, intensity plays a crucial role in optimizing results within a limited time.
A balanced approach of 80% Low-Intensity Steady-State (LISS) or Zone 2 training, and 20% High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has proven successful for many of my clients, addressing the ongoing discussion of short, high-intensity training versus longer, slower distance training effectiveness.
Balanced Approach: HIIT and LISS
HIIT has gained popularity for its effectiveness in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and reducing body fat in shorter training sessions. It's a solution to the time constraints that hinder regular exercise. However, the adaptational responses from LISS / Zone 2 training are uniquely beneficial and distinct from those achieved through HIIT, emphasizing the need for a well-rounded program incorporating both.
A study by Gibala et al. (2012) supported the efficacy of HIIT, demonstrating improvements in aerobic capacity with short intervals of high-intensity exercise(1).
Scientific Insight into HIIT
Research indicates that short intervals of high-intensity exercise can significantly improve VO2 max, a marker for aerobic capacity. For example, three 10-minute sessions weekly, each consisting of three 20-second intervals of intense exercise, can substantially impact muscle oxidative capacity and cardiometabolic health(2).
HIIT Advantages
HIIT stands out due to its ability to enhance enzyme upregulation, trigger growth hormone response, and boost excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), creating an "afterburn" effect(3). However, proper implementation of HIIT is crucial, given its stressful nature, recommending limitation to once or twice a week to avoid overtraining and ensure recovery(4).
Implementing HIIT Effectively
HIIT involves alternating between high-intensity exercise and lower-intensity recovery, crucially above the lactate threshold and close to VO2 max, to avoid volitional fatigue. This active recovery phase is essential for the clearance of lactic acid, aiding in rapid recuperation(5).
Prudent Considerations
Consideration of individual capabilities, pre-existing conditions, and current fitness levels is paramount when incorporating HIIT, and diligent monitoring of exercise volume and intensity is crucial to avoid counterproductive overexertion(6).
Enjoyment and Sustainability
Enjoyment is a significant determinant of the sustainability of any fitness regimen. While HIIT offers substantial benefits, it might not align with everyone's preferences, particularly those new to exercise. Identifying enjoyable and sustainable programs is crucial for achieving long-term fitness goals.
Strategic Integration for Holistic Wellness
In conclusion, a balanced integration of HIIT and LISS / Zone 2 training can facilitate optimal endurance and holistic wellness throughout the annual training cycle. A meticulous consideration of personal fitness levels, goals, and preferences while integrating varied intensities into routines is essential to balance time and effort effectively, optimizing overall results and paving the way for a healthier, more fulfilling lifestyle.
References:
Footnotes
Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., MacDonald, M. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2012). Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and disease. The Journal of Physiology, 590(5), 1077-1084.
Metcalfe, R. S., Babraj, J. A., Fawkner, S. G., & Vollaard, N. B. (2012). Towards the minimal amount of exercise for improving metabolic health: beneficial effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(7), 2767-2775.
LaForgia, J., Withers, R. T., & Gore, C. J. (2006). Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(12), 1247-1264.
Foster, C., Farland, C. V., Guidotti, F., Harbin, M., Roberts, B., Schuette, J., ... & Porcari, J. P. (2015). The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs Steady State Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(4), 747.
Millet, G. Y., & Lepers, R. (2004). Alterations of neuromuscular function after prolonged running, cycling and skiing exercises. Sports Medicine, 34(2), 105-116.
Urhausen, A., & Kindermann, W. (2002). Diagnosis of overtraining: what tools do we have? Sports Medicine, 32(2), 95-102.